This blog post concerns how I feel about what I just submitted to D2L.
"Tired-Guy.jpg"; zokonline.com; 06/2014; Public Domain.
1. I feel confident about what I submitted. I was comfortable talking about the subject.
2. What are the major weaknesses of the project you submitted? Explain carefully how and why you consider these elements to be weak or under-developed.
The incident that I chose was just a guy saying something rather than someone dying/a huge turning point. Even though saying you're going to do something on the world stage is huge, it would have been "easier" to delve if there was an action... like someone throwing a punch or something.
3. What are the major strengths of the project you submitted? Explain carefully how and why you consider these elements to be strong or well-developed.
I have extremely persuasive voice and I understand that my audience may not be completely knowledgeable on the subject. I understood this ahead of time and accounted for it.
Also I did a great job taking a stance. It's my job to persuade you to feel a certain way, not just throw facts and leave you guessing. If you wanted to do that you could just read BBC,
4. What do you think of how you practiced time management for Project 1? Did you put enough time and effort into the project? Did you procrastinate and wait till the last minute to work on things? Share any major time management triumphs or fails....
My time management was not horrible but I did reserve the work for Sunday night. There were times that I didn't click the submit button even when I had the project done (peer review 2.... that sucks!). I guess I just need to double check my submissions..
It sucks doing homework in the 21st century!
No comments:
Post a Comment